St. James land sale questioned by some
School board hopes to acquire tract for new stadium on west bank

By David Vitrano
Published/Last Modified on Saturday, January 28, 2012 1:04 AM CST


L’Observateur

LUTCHER – Although the St. James Parish School Board approved the purchase of a tract of land for the relocation of the St. James High School stadium and the possible relocation of the school itself, some community members still have issues with the way the matter was handled.

“Why wasn’t a public hearing held?” asked west bank resident Yvette Melancon. “I feel you all are hiding something.”

Melancon was joined by a handful of similarly minded residents at Tuesday’s meeting. Patricia Schexnayder, the school board member who represents the west bank, cast the only vote against the measure during the board’s retreat. She voiced feelings to those of her constituents at Tuesday’s meeting.

“The west bank is very disappointed in the selection process,” she said. “It was not done fairly.”

Schexnayder also requested that additional information about the owners of each of the four tracts of land that were being considered be posted to the district’s website, a request that has since been granted.

Toward the end of last year, Superintendent Alonzo Luce and School Board President Charles Nailor entered into negotiations with four sets of land owners concerning the acquisition of property near the intersection of Louisiana highways 20 and 3127 for the possible relocation of St. James High School and its stadium.

After months of negotiations, the administration recommended the district purchase a tract belonging to the Webre-Steib plantation.

Luce said the decision was practically made for the administration. He said that tract was sold for $1 million, less than the $1.3 appraisal price. One of the other tracts was problematic because it has two pipelines running through it, and the owners of two of the other tracts wanted more for the land than the appraisal price. Luce said as a public body the school board cannot legally pay more than appraisal price.

Nailor, in response to accusations of the board not acting in a transparent manner, said, “It’s been publicized for months. We’re going to do what’s best for the kids,” adding, “If it was truly an issue, this board room would be packed.”

The land the board intends to purchase fronts Highway 20, but Luce said another landowner has agreed to donate a small parcel of land for the construction of a road to connect the property to Highway 3127.

Luce said pending legal review, construction of the new St. James High stadium will commence, but he noted that the board is not under the same time constraints as it was during the construction of the new stadium at Lutcher High School.

“We’re going to try to do it as quickly as we can,” said Luce, “but we can still play at the existing stadium.

In other action Tuesday, the school board approved a resolution calling for the issuance and sale of $2.345 million in General Obligation School Refunding Bonds. The action was taken so the board can take advantage of the current low interest rate to pay off existing bonds issued in 2002. The move will save the district more than $95,000, according to bond attorney Hugh Martin.

Said Martin, “It’s not a huge amount, but it is a saving.”

 

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

sounds logical to me wrote on Jan 28, 2012 3:05 AM:

" fair price; central location by population distribution.
I would recommend that all school bus access be from hwy 3127 instead of hwy 20 for congestion and safety concerns.
there is much more room along 3127 for turning lanes etc.
hopefully this will spark a better hurricane evacuation route than hwy20 from thibodaux to 3127. "

WestbankResident wrote on Jan 28, 2012 10:52 PM:

" Mr. Nailor knows that the process was not transparent. Luce and his team supposedly surveyed and met with members of the Eastbank in regards to the Gramercy Magnet Program. Why couldn't he and his team take the initiative to meet with the Westbank residents to gather input about the new school? That is blatant disrespect and no regard for the voices of Westbank residents. Mr. Nailor has poorly represented the Westbank and he is always combative when people question the school board and its interactions with the Westbank. For the life of me, I do not understand why the people of Magnolia and surrounding areas continue to allow him to represent the 6th district, especially since his residency has never been solely in the district. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545