L’ Observateur’s ONLINE POLL
By many readers’ standards, Saints season already a success

By DAVID VITRANO
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:11 AM CST


L’Observateur

LAPLACE – The Saints seem to be on everyone’s lips these days. As such, L’Observateur thought it would be appropriate to ask it readers “The New Orleans Saints' unprecedented 13-0 start created some lofty expectations for the 2009-10 football season. What, if anything, still needs to happen for it to be considered a successful campaign?” in its weekly online poll.

According to poll results, over half of respondents, following the overtime win on Sunday against the Vikings, consider this season a success already.


Another quarter of voters will have to wait until Feb. 7 when the Saints face off against Peyton Manning the Indianapolis Colts in Super Bowl XLIV to see if they can truly call this year a success.

As for the rest of respondents, it seems some people will never be satisfied. Perhaps 43 years has just hardened their hearts to the beloved Black and Gold beyond repair.

A full breakdown of last week’s results follows:

• 14 percent of respondents chose “They've already been more successful this year than any other year. Mission accomplished.”

• 38 percent of respondents chose “The Saints must beat the Vikings on Sunday to call the season an absolute success.”

• 25 percent of respondents chose “All or nothing. They must win the Super Bowl, or the season is a bust.”

• 11 percent of respondents chose “Success? The Saints still have a lot to prove before they can be called a success.”

For next week’s question, L’Observateur will continue to ride the excitement surrounding the Saints, just like the rest of the region. The question is: Sunday’s game against the Minnesota Vikings was one of the most exciting games football fans have seen in a while. In a game truly decided by a few key plays, which play do you think was the most crucial?

Visit www.lobservateur.com to vote.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545