As many of you will recall, on Dec. 21, 1988, a few short days before Christmas, a 747 en route from London to New York was downed by a bomb detonating while the plane was over the now-famous Lockerbie, Scotland. All 243 passengers and 16 crew members (189 of which were U.S. citizens) were killed as well as 11 innocents on the ground — one of the most shocking and costly terrorist acts preceding the events of 9/11.
Shortly after the conclusion of an intense investigation, the United States and British authorities indicted two Libyan intelligence agents for their roles in the bombing — in essence, concluding that the bombing was authorized by the Libyan government and carried out by the named suspects.
|
|
Yet, in an unprecedented and mind-numbing turn of events, this past week, Scotland’s “Justice” Secretary, Kenny MacAskill, released the un-repentant al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds after he served a mere eight years of confinement. (al-Megrahi is said to have only three months to live as the result of prostate cancer.)
Making matters worse, al-Megrahi was received as a hero upon his arrival in Libya, and when he addressed the Libyan and Scottish flag-waving crowd; he continued to stand by his insistence that he was wrongly convicted. That’s right — Secretary MacAskill released a mass murder who has not even accepted responsibility for the actions that led to his conviction.
Following the release, FBI Director Robert Mueller aptly pointed out that, in total, al-Megrahi “served less than 14 days per victim" for his role in this mass murder. Fourteen days for the planned killing of a plane full of innocent passengersâ€- a mere fourteen days for the killing of countless parents, siblings and even young children.
America’s justice system has come under much scrutiny in recent years. Indeed, in today’s complex world, decisions must be made quickly while still weighing the protection of innocent persons against terror against the proper treatment of prisoners. At times, in retrospect, our quick decision may not have always be the best option, but in all of this debate, no one has denied the need for a firm moral code and legal guide in our justice system, and that code should indeed include compassion.
But where the Scottish government has failed in this is acknowledging that we must have compassion for more than just the perpetrator or the indicted. In attempting to demonstrate mercy towards a convicted terrorist and mass murderer, they have failed to demonstrate compassion towards his victims’ loved ones. More than that, they have disregarded all implications for the future — not considering what this man is capable of, nor the impact his release will have on the dynamics of an entire international system.
In the midst of the miscarriage of justice, I mourn with the families whose loss has been treated so cavalierly. And as we continue to wage the battle against terrorism, I can not help the sick feeling in my gut as a murderer is welcomed home to cheering crowds.
Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is chairman and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation (www.reaganlegacyfoundation.org). Look for other info at www.Reagan.com. E-mail comments to Reagan@caglecartoons.com.




Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!