If you fail to look at it from the first line through the last, you may learn too late that you have been “crammed” by a third-party and the charges added to your telephone bill..
The Federal Communications Commission defines cramming as "the practice of placing unauthorized, misleading, or deceptive charges on your telephone bill" by third party companies.
|
|
A call to EDN’s contact number ” which must appear as part of the billing information ” went to an offshore call center where they were more than happy to issue a credit for the charges while also offering a cautionary, “a charge may also show up for July, but please to not worry about that.”
The company claims the charge was authorized by a person named Campbell and, after being told there was no one person at the newspaper, it was quickly explained away as, “They were probably trying to sign up for the service and accidentally entered the incorrect telephone number.”
The only problem with that is there is no person named Campbell with a number even remotely similar to that of the newspaper.
When the customer service person was advised the incident would be developed into a news story as well as resulting in a complaint to the state Public Service Commission, she did her best to be reassuring as she offered, “There is no need to do that, as it has already been handled.”
Oh, well. Why not do it just the same?
Your telephone company ” such as AT&T ” accepts the word of these third-party companies that the charge has been approved by someone who has the authority to do so. The phone companies receive a percentage of the charges, so it is a revenue point for them.
In Virginia, the state requires the person or business whose number is about the be charged to be called for approval and that confirmation numbers be given. Louisiana offers to such protection, but does have a web page that offers complaint information ” although that page (http://www.lpsc.org/headlines_teleslam.asp) has an outdated list of PSC commissioners.
Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!