Census boycott makes absolutely no sense


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, May 13, 2009 7:57 AM CDT


If the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders wanted to bring attention to the illegal immigration issue, it certainly accomplished that.

Unfortunately for the group and its cause of comprehensive immigration reform, its position of urging illegal immigrants to refuse to be counted in the 2010 Census will be counterproductive and hurt the states and communities where illegal immigrants live the most.

This proposed boycott just doesn't make sense. ...

(T)he information collected is confidential, and census officials say they don't ask people about their immigration status or require Social Security numbers. ...

The census is used to determine congressional districts and the number of representatives a state has in Congress. That would mean less representation in Congress for areas with the most undocumented immigrants, potentially reducing the number of lawmakers sympathetic to the cause of immigration reform.

Perhaps most importantly, the census also is used to allocate federal dollars for social programs and other areas, such as schools and health care. Taxpayers in states and communities with many illegal immigrants, such as Cumberland County with an estimated 14,000, would not get their fair share of federal support and could have to make up the difference through local taxes. States also apportion money based on population, so it could mean being shortchanged on state funds, too.

We believe Congress needs to approve comprehensive immigration reform, which should include some type of guest worker program and a pathway to citizenship for immigrants.

But if this national coalition of Latino ministers thinks that this boycott will pressure Congress to pass such reform and get more Americans to support its cause, it better think again.

— The Daily Journal,

Vineland, N.J.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545