The ruling alters the board’s previous advisory opinion, which said council members were not allowed to receive any compensation from an insurance company that has a contractual relationship with the parish.
The ethics board drafted the opinion in response to a request from the parish’s ethics attorney, who had asked that the board reconsider the original advisory opinion requested by a LaPlace area insurance agent who lost a recent bid for a parish insurance contract.
|
|
Following Sexton’s presentation, the board adopted a motion to draft an opinion that said Lee was not in violation.
LaPlace insurance agent John Millet requested the advisory opinions from the board on whether he could submit proposals on behalf of insurance companies when members of the council have relationships with those companies. The February 2008 opinion said he could not submit proposals for those companies according to a state ethics code that does not allow officials or their spouses to receive compensation from a business that has a contract with the parish.
Sexton said the ruling does not bar Lee, or any other council member with affiliations with insurance companies, from voting on parish insurance matters since that issue was not addressed during the hearing.




Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!