The matter had been the subject of some controversy lately, as the it first came up a few school board meeting ago but kept getting pushed back because an acceptable agreement had not yet been settled upon.
Then, at the first school board meeting in April, Russ Wise moved that alternate proposals be sought. That motion failed, and the matter was put off until the next meeting.
|
|
Board Member James Madere again moved that the board seek outside proposals.
At that point, Patrick Sanders said, “The system seems to be doing pretty well as it is.” He questioned whether entering into a transitional period at this point would be wise.
It was also suggested the motion was out of order because a similar motion had been offered at the previous meeting. After consulting with Board Attorney Lloyd LeBlanc, however, it was determined the motion was not the same as the one that had been offered at the previous meeting.
Nonetheless, the motion failed with a vote of 5-6.
The original motion to accept the renegotiated contract was again put before the board, passing with a vote of 8-3. Madere, Wise and Phillip Johnson cast the dissenting votes.
Earlier in the meeting, Executive Director of Business and Finance Felix Boughton brought up the matter of sales taxes in the parish.
He said the sales tax revenue in the parish was so high, the district would finish the school year with a surplus. He added, however, “Next year, we’re going to need that surplus.”
According to Boughton, the parish will be losing some of its MFP money next year because of strong growth and revenue this year.




Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!