Latest EPA proposals will be costly


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 10:12 AM CDT


The EPA’s proposal to regulate carbon dioxide and other gases is a power grab orchestrated by radical environmentalists to help the President pass his reckless “cap and trade” energy tax that will raise energy and utility costs on every American family, and ship millions of American jobs overseas.

The President has acknowledged that his plan will lead to higher electricity prices by stating, “under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”

According to Peter Orszag, the President’s own budget director, the average annual household cost increase would be about $1,300 for a 15 percent cut in CO2 emissions which is 80 percent less than the cut sought in Obama’s proposed budget. Orszag testified before Congress last year saying that price increases borne by consumers are essential to the success of their “cap and trade” program.

U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise has co-sponsored legislation (H.R.391) that would clarify that EPA does not have the authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate Greenhouse gases, which they have never before had the authority to regulate. EPA regulation of CO2 would constitute EPA’s largest assertion of authority over the American economy.

As a member of the Energy and Environment Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over national energy policy and The Clean Air Act, Scalise has said he will continue fighting to oppose bad policies that threaten our economy.

Rather than a “cap and trade” scheme that will raise taxes on American families and ship millions of jobs overseas, America needs to pass a comprehensive national energy policy that will further develop the technologies for renewable sources of energy like wind and solar, encourage more conservation, but will also expand our own natural resources including oil, natural gas, clean coal, and nuclear power.

Our national elected officials have failed us at every turn when it comes to helping us escape the bonds of energy dependency. At some point, those of us who send them off to Washington must hold them accountable ... we must expect more. No, we must demand more. If we don’t, we still be complaining about “them doing nothing” when the last pieces of this once great nation crumble at our feet.

It’s up to us.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545