Feasibility of Montz project reconsidered


Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:17 PM CDT


Louisiana Public Service Commissioner Lambert C. Boissiere plans to introduce a motion today at the Commission’s Business and Executive Session that would direct Entergy to review the feasibility of the Little Gypsy repowering project in Montz.

Boissiere wants Entergy to review the project’s viability based upon a number of factors including the recent decline in natural gas prices.

“Little Gypsy may not have the same positive impact for Louisiana ratepayers today as it did when presented to the LPSC in November 2007,” Boissiere said.

The motion will direct Entergy to review the repowering project based upon the most current data available. The motion will also direct Entergy to make a filing with the Commission and present their position based upon current information.

“I want Entergy to temporarily suspend the Little Gypsy repowering project and carefully review the feasibility of this project,” Boissiere said. “I want to know whether Entergy intends to move forward with this project based on the most current facts and projections.”

Environmental concerns, the unknown costs of carbon legislation and changes in the capital/financial markets are also factors in Boissiere’s desire to review the project’s viability. The little Gypsy conversion project, approved unanimously by the LPSC in November 2007, was intended to repower an existing natural gas generating unit by burning petroleum coke and coals. Initially, the project was estimated to cost approximately $1 billion, however, costs have escalated to approximately $1.76 billion. Entergy Louisiana is primarily reliant on natural gas to produce electricity. Currently, daily natural gas prices on the NYMEX HenryHub are approximately $4.25/MMBtu, which is a sharp dedine from the approximately $13.00/MMBtu seen in the summer of 2008.

 

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545