Water rate increases approved

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Monday, February 2, 2009 1:02 PM CST


Staff Reporter

LAPLACE – Faced with a $1.5 million deficit in the parish’s utility system fund, the St. John Council decided Tuesday to approve two ordinances that will affect the rates the parish charges for water in an effort to remedy a serious cash flow problem within the department.

The first ordinance pertains to a change in the method in which the parish calculates the consumer price index (CPI) for parish water services. Under the new system, residential customers could see a monthly bill increase of about $1.57.

The ordinance changes the water rate CPI from a National Consumer Price Index to the U.S. city average 12-month percentage change in the Water, Sewer and Trash Collection Service Group of Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).

The new index, which is the same one that is used to compute the annual consumer price index adjustment for the parish’s sewer rate, comes with a 6.7 percent rate adjustment. The previous CPI only produces a 1.1 percent adjustment.

The council voted 8-1 in favor of the measure, with Councilwoman Cheryl Millet casting the lone dissenting vote.

“In my heart, I just can’t do it,” Millet said before the vote. “I think the timing just isn’t right.”

The second ordinance, which also passed 8-1 with Councilman Dale Wolfe voting against, creates a $1 rate increase per thousand gallons on the parish’s two highest consumption tiers. This means that customers who use 30,000 to 50,000 gallons of water per month would be charged $3.93 per thousand. Customers using over 50,000 gallons would be charged $3.82 per thousand.

St. John Public Information Officer Buddy Boe said the rate increase only affects about 380, or 2.3 percent, of the parish’s water customers. He said most of those 380 are big industry or commercial outlets in the parish.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545