Port set to take reins at St. John airfield
Runway extension among first projects tackled by possible new air traffic controllers

By KEVIN CHIRI
Published/Last Modified on Friday, December 5, 2008 2:12 PM CST


Editor and Publisher

LAPLACE – The new Hubbard administration in St. John government has confirmed yet another pending change for the parish that had languished for years without action.

After years of talking about the possibility of the Port of South Louisiana taking over control of the St. John Airport, L’Observateur confirmed this week that the parish expects such a change to occur within the next few months.

Joel Chaisson

Parish President Bill Hubbard, who previously served for eight years on the board of the Port of South Louisiana, began serious talks with the Port in recent months to try and get things moving so the Port could take control of the airport.

The move had been discussed for years by St. John officials, but no action was ever taken.

Hubbard said that he and Port of South Louisiana Executive Director Joel Chaisson Sr. had meetings in recent months that led to a tentative agreement for the shift. Attorneys are currently drawing up the legal documentation that would effect such a change.

If approved by both sides, the Port would begin managing the St. John Airport operations, and lead the way for the much-needed runway extension—something else that has been talked about for many years.

“For the entire eight years I was on the board, the idea of having the Port run the airport was discussed,” Hubbard said. “But quite frankly, the previous administration and the council just never could work it out. Mr. Chaisson and I are both movers and shakers, and we just got together and got it done.”

Hubbard, since taking over as parish president this past January, has made it a point to take charge of one project after another and push it through. The airport management is another example of a long list of projects that have now been dealt with.

Should the Port take over management of the airport, it should open the door to rapid action on getting the 1,000-foot runway extension, as well as bring a number of businesses to the airport property. The runway is presently 4,000-feet long, but cannot accommodate larger planes.

“We have always wanted to have control of the airport since it’s just a logical move for us,” Chaisson said. “We already have a big hand in bringing businesses to this area, and this now gives us a chance to improve the situation at the airport so we can draw more businesses to the region. That means economic stimulus, as well as jobs for the area.”

The Port is already on its way to getting the runway extension done, thanks to a $500,000 grant from the Louisiana Legislature that is funding the environmental impact study, which is already underway.

“That is our first step to get the runway extension, and we couldn’t have done it without the money from the Legislature,” Chaisson said.

And Hubbard added that “the money for something like that comes a lot easier when an entity like the Port seeks it from the Legislature. That’s just one way it will work better for everyone when the Port is operating the airport.”

Additionally, the parish has been losing between $70,000 and $100,000 a year just operating the airport, since it has not been a money-making operation. Once the Port takes it over, the loss will be wiped out.

Should the pending deal go through, the Port will essentially lease the property from the parish—since St. John owns all the land in that area—and begin making all the decisions to manage the airport operations.

That will also include leasing more of the land surrounding the airport.

“St. John will get to share in all the opportunities the airport brings us,” Hubbard added. “But the change will be a big benefit for St. John for several reasons. Any company that comes will bring more jobs and more tax revenue for us, and that will certainly increase when we get the runway extended.”

Not only is 1,000 feet expected to be added to the length, but Chaisson said they also want to increase it by 25 feet in width, which will not allow the biggest commercial airliners to land, but will allow much larger corporate jets, as well as cargo planes that are big enough to carry one or two containers.

“We already have been asked for quite a while by a number of companies about extending our runway so they could do more business here,” Chaisson said.

The Port director said a number of aviation-related businesses have expressed interest in relocating to the St. John Airport if it was a longer runway.

Chaisson said he hopes the runway extension, which will cost close to $3 million, can be finished in no longer than 18 months. The Port has to go through FAA approval, not to mention getting the funds to build it. But he believes the money will be found someplace soon if everything else is in place.

The St. John Airport would also become attractive for some corporations to keep their smaller jets here since Lakefront Airport has experienced a huge increase in their insurance premiums, all hurricane related after recent huge storms have hit the area.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

W T F wrote on Dec 7, 2008 9:46 PM:

" If this thing was losing $$$100,000 a year, why were we footing the bill?
Why didn't you crooks shut it down?
How many other undercover and underhanded scams have you been running on the tax payers?
THE ACCUMILATED LOSSES NEED TO BE TAKEN
OUT OF SOME GOVT. OFFICIALS HIDE.
SUITS OF MISCONDUCT NEED TO BE FILED>\. "

Darrell wrote on Dec 9, 2008 5:52 AM:

" As a former member of the St. John Airport advisory board, I'm glad to see the port finally take it over. For years the parish with its buracracy and politics,has let many businesses slip away to other areas. A prime example is Gray Insurance Company, which origionally sought to move operations here, decided to move to the Hammond Airport instead and not only built hangers for its 3 aircraft, but also its corporate offices. The advisory board had lots of dedicated people try and get thing rolling, but the parish seemed to put everything on the back burner. It was a very frustrating ordeal to go to meeting every month and not see any action taken by the parish. Hopefully the port will keep the excellent engineering firm on board to complete all the planned projects.You can't get businesses to locate here when it takes over 6 months just to talk to the right departments and adjust for their meeting. This airport has lots of potential, but it is a General Aviation Reliever airport, and will never be more than that for small aircraft and corporate jets, which is a benifit to the parish and the economic development of industry. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545