Pastor says suspect not a youth leader

By KEVIN CHIRI
Published/Last Modified on Friday, December 5, 2008 2:12 PM CST


Editor and Publisher

RESERVE – The pastor of a Reserve church said that a young man recently charged with molestation was not a leader in their church youth group, as had been previously reported.

Christopher Davis, 19, of 2401 Yorktowne Dr. in LaPlace, was arrested last week and charged with indecent behavior, and five counts of molestation of a juvenile, allegedly involving a 13-year-old boy who attended the Reserve Christian Church youth group.

The church was linked to the event since Davis reportedly picked the young man up in his car, and took him to and from the church youth group. St. John sheriff’s reports indicate the molestation took place going to and from the youth group meetings.

Even though the Sheriff’s Office investigator said that both victim and suspect called Davis a “leader in the youth group,” which is how it was reported to the media, the pastor of Reserve Christian Church said Davis was never appointed to any official leadership position.

“That’s simply not true, he was only a church member,” Pastor Stephen Aguillard said. “As for the victim and suspect saying that, I believe it probably happened since Chris was one of the older kids in the youth group and hung out with the older college age group.”

St. John Sheriff Wayne Jones said that his investigators can only release the information they obtain in their interviews, and stands by the report as issued by Public Information Officer Mike Tregre.

Aguillard said he was first informed of the pending arrest on Monday, Nov. 10, and was expecting the Sheriff’s Office to contact him during that week. But then he was surprised when he got an early morning call on Friday, Nov. 14 saying the arrest was in the newspaper, and Davis had been called a “worker” at the church.

“That led people to believe he was an employee here, and then they called him a youth leader also. Neither of those things is true and I was unhappy that the Sheriff’s Office never called me all week to give me a chance to give my side of that story,” Aguillard said.

However Jones said Aguillard was not contacted since investigators were focusing on the crime at hand, and seeking other evidence for charges.

“The investigators were doing what they thought was the right thing to do when it came to who they talked to,” Jones said. “And I’m not going to get in the middle of an investigation. We have no obligation to contact anyone in particular that the investigators do not contact. It is not my place to impede an investigation in that way.”

Aguillard said that the youth group saw a drop in attendance of about 30 percent immediately after the news was made public, but at this point he wants to focus on what he says is a lot of good his youth leaders and members have done.

“I just hope people will remember that we have had a reputation for integrity for 40 years here,” he said. “That should stand for itself.

“Our youth group leadership all goes through background checks if they are going to work with young people or children,” he said. “We have always done that. As for what we could have done to stopped this from happening, I don’t see how anyone can prevent this kind of thing if someone is doing it on their own. And I am not talking about Chris. He is innocent until proven guilty.”

Aguillard said that the Reserve Christian Church youth group continues to minister to approximately 400 students each week, which involves going to many public school lunch clubs that are started by students, as well as their own church functions.

The youth group on Wednesday night at the church is currently running around 120 students, from age 6 to 21, which is broken into two groups—a children’s network from age 6 to 12, and a youth group from age 13 to 21.

“We have always felt like our youth group is doing a lot of great things for the young people in this community, and it’s probably one of the best kept secrets in the region,” he added. “I know all of our youth leaders and they truly have a heart for the youth of this community. So I guess I just want people to know that they don’t have to be afraid to let their kids be involved here. Fear can be a terrible thing to people when something like this happens.”

Aguillard added that he is not passing judgment on Davis in this case, and simply wants justice to be done.

“We will be on the side of justice,” he said. “If anyone does something wrong, we will not hide or cover anything up. We are still here, cooperating with any aspect of the investigation and still have a good working relationship with Sheriff Jones and the St. John Sheriff’s Office. I just wish I had been contacted that week so we could have gotten the correct information out when the news media got this. I think we were done a disservice.”

Sheriff’s Office investigators were led to the arrest after the 13-year-old’s mother opened an e-mail message addressed to her son that included a picture of a naked man. Her son, whose name was not released to protect the family, later identified the man as Davis. The mother immediately reported it to the Sheriff’s Office.

Davis was booked that day and released on bond.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

WHOS LYING wrote on Dec 5, 2008 8:16 PM:

" AGUILLARD: Don't you teach your young people to report immediately any inappropriate physical or verbal contact by adults? Wasn't Davis a member of your cult in contact with your children? The initial news article
stated that "church officials were unavailable for comments".
If you had wished, you could easily have corrected any errors by replying to the reporter's questions. "

WHAT DID YOU SAY wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:03 AM:

" Aguillard: The news media tried to contact you about the incident and you chose to keep mum. WHY? "

YGTBK wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:12 AM:

" Aguillard: 5 counts of molestation???
Davis claims he was self appointed leader in the youth group and the victim
agreed. Do you let anyone take the role of youth leader who wants to without verifying their qualification and character?
DO you muzzle the children so they can't report this type of molestation? "

W T F wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:21 AM:

" Aguillard: Just what do you teach to the young ones? Don't you warn them about predators? All you have done is defend, deny, make excuses, and blame
other people for getting the details wrong. What did YOU do that was right?
I BEG TO DIFFER WITH YOUR STATAMENT:
"YES" absolutely; people need to fear letting their children get involved with your gang; they are not safe around you and members of your cult. "

YOU OVERSEE WITH YOUR EYES CLOSED wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:32 AM:

" AGUILLARD: You state that your youth program is a best kept secret.
SHOULDN"T YOU BE SHOUTING IT TO THE WORLD? How can you claim that you teach the right thing to do; without teaching that there are wrong things; things you shouldn't do? Don't you teach that wrongful behavior should be reported to the proper authority? "

ZERO TOLERANCE wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:44 AM:

" Aguillard:
You claim a 30% drop in attendance
in the youth group.
If you would be doing the responsible
thing, you should have disbanded all
activities until, ALL PERSONS INVOLVED
IN THE YOUTH GROUP WERE INTERVIEWED,
MADE AWARE OF THE POTENTIAL FOR SUCH
INCIDENTS, AND MADE PROVISIONS FOR REPORTING ANY INCIDENTS. "

ANGRY PARENT wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:51 AM:

" Aguillard: You were not done a disservice; the disservice was done by your organization to the children and parents who trusted you and thought you knew what you were doing in organizing
these activities. "

YOUR REPUTATION wrote on Dec 6, 2008 12:59 AM:

" Aguillard: Have you been a leader or even involved with this group for the last 40 years? NO? Well the reputation you speak of is not yours but the people involved over that time. Your reputation consists of the time frame in which you are involved. That span sadly includes this incident. Quit pointing fingers at others for incorrect details and accept that you should have done more to think ahead and take steps that would have prevented this sordid episode. "

BE AFRAID wrote on Dec 6, 2008 1:10 AM:

" Aguillard: Don't tell people not to fear; on the contrary; fear is the best safety mechanism. Fear keeps people on their guard. Obviously, you did not fear and you let your guard down. Fear should have jolted you out of your stupor, waiting for the authorities to call you and should have brought you to your senses in order to cause you to pursue the facts of the allegations. "

YOUR FAULT wrote on Dec 6, 2008 1:23 AM:

" Aguillard: How can you say you were unhappy the sheriff's office did not call you? Why should the sheriff call you; were you a suspect or a witness?
It was your place to call and offer assistance. You didn't. It was your responsibility to make sure everyone involved in the youth program was above reproach. You didn't. You need to accept accountability and rededicate yourself to the mission at hand and you need to do "what ever is necessary" to protect the children. "

TALK LIKE A POLITICIAN wrote on Dec 6, 2008 7:46 AM:

" AGUILLARD: You said you wish you had been "contacted to get the correct in formation out", yet when the media attempted to contact you; you were unavailable for comment. By your statement, you are calling the media liars. Is it not, in fact, you who are the liar? You kept quiet, hoping the incident wouldn't draw attention, now you are crawfishing and finger-pointing. "

GONE wrote on Dec 6, 2008 8:39 AM:

" What happened to the bald headed messiah
the rcc was hailing as the converted lost soul that was to set the example
for salvation and redemption?
Did his background check reveal something that caused you to drop him out of the news?
Aguillard: You have a lot of explaining to do; try to come up with some believable renditions. "

NEWS FLASH wrote on Dec 6, 2008 4:06 PM:

" RCC: comes out swinging;
"its not our fault" (bull)
"he's not a youth leader"
"it was done away from rcc"
"nobody called us" (lie)
"we do back-ground checks" (???)
"there is nothing
we could have done" (BULL)
"we were done a disservice" (BIG BULL)
DENIAL IS NOT A RIVER IN AFRICA "

Mari Acosta wrote on Dec 8, 2008 10:08 AM:

" Throw the book @ him with the strength of Paul Bunyan. Released on bond!! I hope Davis runs into the right parent that will teach him right from wrong. Could you all post his picture so that the concerned citizens of the river parishes region can protect the children. "

PMK wrote on Dec 8, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Regarding the above comments. You are all blasting Pastor Aguillard and the church ministry but have you really looked at the facts. Do you know when the office was contacted for information or a response. A message was left after office hours. How about that. If you really wanted to hear a response before going to print you would have called during office hours. As far as Davis is concerned, he is innocent until proven guilty. Not one other negative word has been spoken against him in this situation. IF this was an ongoing thing it would have happened with others. "

Concerned parent wrote on Dec 8, 2008 3:48 PM:

" Wow - so the reverand is responsible for EVERYTHING that anyone does in the group. Give me a break. This man and this Church are trying to help people with problems - when ever you try you put yourself at risk. Thank goodness some people take chances to help people.
He who is without a sin cast the first stone. I see we have a lot of spotless people in the area. "

Mitigator wrote on Dec 8, 2008 5:05 PM:

" I agree that Mr Aguillard shoud have done more to protect not only the youth but also the young adults who were participating in these groups.

In no case should a person 17 or older transport a non relative that is younger than 17 without another adult being present.

Mr Aguillard if you have not all ready made this a rule for your youth Groups you need to. "

WAY TO GO MARI wrote on Dec 8, 2008 5:13 PM:

" You go get them girl.
But don't stop with this one scum-bag.
The people that set up the programs without the proper safeguards are the one that made this possible.
They are the ones that ceated the environment that predators look for; with a lot of potential targets grouped together; all they have to do is mingle
amongst the sheep and choose the easy targets; the hard work of herding the victims together has been done by someone else. "RCC/aguillard" "

FACTS wrote on Dec 9, 2008 4:40 PM:

" pmk:
A predator is loose among your sheep.1
Your shepard is asleep under his rock.2
The predator attacks one of your flock.3
Your shepard crawls out from under his rock and blames everyone else but himself.4
The predator is released to strike again.5
Your sheep are still at risk.6
HOW ARE THOSE FOR FACTS?
How do you know this sort of thing is not going on unreported?
If the boy's mother had not discovered the situation; how many others would have been victimized and for how long? "

JUSTICE SEEKER wrote on Dec 9, 2008 4:54 PM:

" concerned parent: You gullible bible-quoter; Aguillard is making a living off of you; expending the least effort
possible. You are being blinded by the mask of his 'church'. As far as spotless people in the area; how many are preying on your children? The only one made public so far comes from within
Aguillard's crew. If you like quotes:
"BE VIGILANT LEST YOU BE VICTIMIZED" "

SUGGESTION wrote on Dec 9, 2008 5:06 PM:

" MITIGATOR: I am gratified that you took the time to express your suggestion.
Here's another; establish a discreet
information box(like a suggestion box)
and encourage input; especially from the younger members, detailing improper verbal or physical incidents by other individuals; the anonimity of the reports would prevent embarrassment and the contents could be investigated by a
committee to establish validity and corrective action. "

Mitigator wrote on Dec 10, 2008 7:50 PM:

" Suggestion, that is an excellent idea. We must encourage our young to tell us when an adult is acting improperly with them. A discreet information box is an excellent idea with an independent investigative comittee, preferably the St John Sheirffs Office.

But, we must also safeguard our young adults who are trying to bring more members into the Church against false accusations. This is where Mr. Aguillard failed.

Mr Aguillard had no control of the leaders of his youth groups. There were no rules or guidlines for these groups or their leaders who met independently outside of the Church.

I have been to Reserve Christian Church a couple of times and know for a fact that Mr Davis was not employed by the Church or was he one of the Youth Leaders of the Church but he did have a Youth Leader that was in charge of his group who should be held responsible as well.

I believe this youth leader is 23 or 24 years old and he was having a 19 year old, (Davis), pick up kids that were 13 or 14.

I am sorry my Aguillard this is not the 1950's this is 2008 and you can not operate your Church that way. Where have you been the last 10 years when all of the scandals in the Catholic Church were going on.

All you have to mention is Child, Molestation, Adult, and Church and you are a National Headline. Even though Davis was not employed or an offical Youth leader of your church you did not have anything in place to protect the child or this young adult that was taking these kids to the Youth Groups. "

a friend of rcc wrote on Dec 10, 2008 9:41 PM:

" why should it be stevens fault.he did not do any thing .he told you people this man went to his church,he gave this boy a ride to and from rcc.he was not a youth leader.does your pastor know who rides home with you.when the peiest of st.peters did this for years,to young boys.was all of them marked and at blame no.blame the lost soul who did do this.most of all where was this childs mother.my words it is far from a cult.i was never made to go and never forced to stay.never hurt me or my son.both brother steven and brother rod are great poeple,stop hearing things and go see it for yourself.i will pray for all who talk with out going to see for yourself. "

YGTBK wrote on Dec 11, 2008 1:30 PM:

" friend of rcc: poor deluded soul; if you are comfortable with the situation at rcc; wallow in it. Meanwhile the rest of us will be extremely watchful
over our vulnerable children. There are enough dangers in the world with the internet and such; who would have thought we would find the same dangers at the center of our community?
"PARENTS"; our children need "US"!!!! "

Ex student of RCC wrote on Dec 12, 2008 8:53 AM:

" This sort of situation happens everywhere and in every religion. I am a former student of RCS and all I can say is that, no one not even a pastor can be aware of everything that is going on outside the church community. Let's remember that they have some sick people out there, no matter what beliefs they have. This happened with Steven and a similar situation happened when his father was the pastor. If you are not going to have trust in this church or pastor, then you need not to trust all pastors or priest in every relgion. Because as I said before, this happens in ALL religions. "

outsider looking in wrote on Dec 12, 2008 10:48 AM:

" I read these comments and I'm so disheartened. Reserve Christian cannot be held accountable for an individual's actions. Nor can they be held accountable for the parent allowing her son to ride with someone she didn't TRULY know. I don't know all of the circumstances, but I know that I attend church and there are a lot of parents who just expect their kids to find a ride there and a ride home. Those who feel sorry for the kids will give them rides... and some people who are a little nuts will take advantage of those opportunities. I don't blame the church... a church should be open to all who want to attend and can't say "you did wrong and you are shunned" and "I think you're a little too close to the edge, so don't come back". Neither can a church TRULY know someone's secret life. As much as you can try and try to prevent situations like this, it only takes two being alone for one minute. Lay off of the church... "

SUGGESTION wrote on Dec 12, 2008 12:21 PM:

" MITIGATOR: I am really glad to see that you have your head on straight and are aware of the reality of the situation.
"OUTSIDER","EX STUDENT", and "FRIEND OF RCC" seem to want to take the same stand as aguillard and look at the world with blinders on.
"IF HE IS NOT SMART OR CAPABLE ENOUGH TO OPERATE THE YOUTH GROUP WITH ENOUGH SAFEGUARDS IN PLACE TO PROTECT THE PARTICIPANTS; AGUILLARD SHOULD SHUT IT DOWN OR TURN IT OVER TO SOMEONE WHO IS
NOT LIVING IN HIS FANTASY WORLD.
The real world has real problems and
RCC needs a leader who will NEVER let his guard down. The responsibility for the group falls on the leader; and if he won't accept it; he is not a competent leader and needs to move aside and make room for someone else. "

TOLD YOU SO wrote on Dec 12, 2008 12:41 PM:

" "EX STUDENT"; has slip of the tongue and refers to previous similar incident.
Aguillard had previously boasted of reputation beyond reproach. IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN as long as long as it is allowed. Parents who allow their children into dangerous situations need to be charged with endangerment. "YES,
BLAME THE CHURCH; IF THEY CONTINUE TO SPONSER ACTIVITIES THAT PUT CHILDREN IN DANGER AGAIN AFTER IT HAPPENED BEFORE". "

Mitigator wrote on Dec 14, 2008 1:10 AM:

" Who is responsible for the the United
States of America. I would think that it is George W. Bush. He does not blame the department of justice when things are wrong, unlike Mr. Aguillard. He confronts the individual issues, accepts responsibility and presses forward.

When you are a leader you must accept all of the consequences that come with the job good or bad.

I have never been so ahamed in my life of anythihng but when I heard Mr Aguillard trying to create distance between himself and the Davis Family I came close to throwing up. The previous article where most of these threads are generated from was from a personal statement by Mr Aguillard saying that Mr Davis was not an employee of the Church or a Youth leader of the Church. I know that is true but Mr Aguillard did you tell the public that the 23 year old that was in charge of Mr Davis's youth group, Ashton Cage, considered Mr Davis oone of his leaders and that this 23 year old called one of Mr Davis's female friends and told her that it was wrong for her to be hanging around Mr Davis.

In additon, Mr Aguillaed, did you know that when Mr Davis was having a quarterly family day with his relatives that this youth leader called him and chewed him out because he would not be able to provide transporatation for some of the members.

I have a problem with this and your youth groups. "

TOLD YOU SO wrote on Dec 15, 2008 11:18 AM:

" MITIGATOR: I AGREE WITH YOU 100%.
Thanks for the honest, revealing comments. "

TOLD YOU SO wrote on Dec 16, 2008 11:39 PM:

" More information keeps leaking out as to the depth of the cover-up by rcc; showing aguillard was not forthcoming with his knowledge of suspicious situations and previous improprieties.
Isn't it a crime to with-hold information from the police about a criminal act??
How about filing some charges against aguillard? "

Ex student of RCS wrote on Dec 18, 2008 1:03 PM:

" To TOLD YOU SO, I bet your the kind of person that thinks your children doesn't do anything wrong. And that it is everyone elses fault. Yes, the pastor or ministers are responsible for their community. However, isn't it also the responsiblity for the parents to know who their kids associate with? Where are your comments when a priest commits this kind of behavoir? "

TOLD YOU SO wrote on Dec 19, 2008 5:34 PM:

" EX STUDENT:
Some priests are lower than stray dogs, we know, but you are missing the point.
And, yes parents should be more involved, but the point is all the curve balls aguillard is pitching.
"WHO SET UP THE YOUTH ACTIVITIES AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR OPERATION??
WHO KNEW THAT SIMILAR INCIDENTS HAD OCCURRED AND FAILED TO TAKE STEPS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE? FINGER-POINTING AT PARENTS AND PRIESTS TO DEFLECT THE ISSUE
DOESN"T WORK. READ THE ARTICLE SLOWLY AND CONCENTRATE; NOTICE ALL THE DISCREPANCIES FROM THE FACTS. "

YGTBK wrote on Dec 19, 2008 5:49 PM:

" EX STUDENT; I would think that no matter what anyone might say in public;
there are very few parents that think anybody's children are without fault.
That is the whole point of having responsible adults overseeing their
activities. That's where aguillard dropped the ball. It sounds like you and aguillard are the ones trying to blame everyone else. "

Mitigator wrote on Dec 19, 2008 11:37 PM:

" You are correct "to told you so" It was the responsibility of the parents to monitor who their child is hanging around with.

I am a responsible parent and I would never let my child ride in a car with some one that I had never met.

I do not want to blame this kid's parents but where were you. If I were the defense attorney, you would be one of the first people that I put up on the stand. Where were you????? If this kid was molested five times as he states why he did not tell you after the first or second time.

Was he scared of the perpetrator of did this ordeal never happen????

Aguillard has alreay demonstrated that he is not a man and is only concerned about protecting the revenues of the Church. This is not about the church because it has been stated numerous times that Mr. Davis was not an employee of the Church or a Youth Pastor. We all get that. But, Mr Aguillard Mr. Davis was picking up these kids for one of your Youth groups and Mr Cage was in charge of this group.

I ask you the parents of this kid who is accusing Mr. Davis of groping him, be sure you know the truth before your child is put on the stand because if this child is lying you can be held responsible. "

NEWS FLASH wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:18 PM:

" Child predator and activity organizer still free to put children at risk.
Organizer has yet to be charged with negligence resulting child molestation. "

ANGRY wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:37 AM:

" SUE THEM OUT OF EXISTENCE LIKE THEY ARE DOING TO THE CATHOLICS. "

Warrior2King wrote on Dec 23, 2008 12:38 PM:

" Greetings: I fight for the rights of all. I beleive everything should be investigated and then determined actions should be taken.+ + + "

REGULAR READER wrote on Dec 23, 2008 1:58 PM:

" The victim's family needs to file suit against RCC, aguillard, and davis.
SUE THEM TO HELL AND BACK!!!
It should make for good headlines like it is for the catholics. If something isn't done, they will let it happen again as they have in the past. "

misty wrote on Dec 24, 2008 11:01 AM:

" ok was the pope blamed when that preist from st peters did that to all those young men.no not at all.is he in jail no,was he ever no.only had to pay alot of money.the catholics put their self out of existence,had to pay alot out to young men.mr aguillard should know all of the poeple who work for him,but as he said he did not work for him.poeple read revelations,some of you will get it.some will not till that day.god bless all of you.i pray and will keep praying for pastor aguillard and his church.look around you do you really know the poeple who work for you or with you,sorry to tell you not.have a great god filled day "

REGULAR READER wrote on Dec 26, 2008 1:33 PM:

" misty: You have to be totally ignorant to compare aguillard to the pope; you might as well compare aguillard to god.
The priests have been and are being dealt with; we are still waiting for aguillard and rcc to be dealt with.
You need to pray for the children who are at risk because of aguillard's incompetence and rcc's lack of action in this matter. and for enlightenment "

notallbad wrote on Dec 28, 2008 9:28 PM:

" My son went to youth group meetings at RC and he met good people. It was a positive place. I am very sorry this happened to this young man but how can you blame this church? People need to put the blame on the person who commited this crime. He will get his day in court and if he is found guilty blame him. "

MAYBE NOT wrote on Dec 29, 2008 11:22 AM:

" notallbad; I suppose even murderers and rapists are not all bad either; some of them are probably kind to their mothers.
You should thank god that you have a decent family and they didn't get caught up in aguillard's incompetence. "

misty wrote on Dec 29, 2008 12:50 PM:

" thank you NOTALLBAD,i so agree,but stupid poeple will be stupid.like regular reader. anyone who don't open their minds eyes and hearts.come see for yourself don't go by what poeple tell you about rcc come check it out yourself. "

BECAUSE wrote on Dec 29, 2008 4:55 PM:

" notallbad: aguillard set up the situation via the rcc if that's what you are calling the (church).
The person who committed the crime is walking the streets free to prey on someone else's child.
Aguillard was not forthcoming about similar previous incidents.
Aguillard continues to shirk accountability. I could go on and on. "

REGULAR READER wrote on Dec 30, 2008 5:11 PM:

" misty; You don't know me to call me stupid.
It is in fact you who are the one who refuses to see the facts.
If everyone who doesn't agree with you is stupid; I am grateful to be in such good company. Read what "because " and "maybe not" wrote; I agree with their point of view; does that make them stupid too?
By the way, I paid attention in class and learned spelling, grammar, and punctuation; by your posted comment, you have proved how STUPID YOU ARE!!! "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545