Four displaced by LaPlace fire

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Monday, November 24, 2008 11:05 AM CST


Staff Reporter

LAPLACE – An early morning fire ripped through a LaPlace house early Wednesday morning leaving its residents with few belongings and no home.

The four occupants of the home, located at 615 W. 5th St. in LaPlace, were able to escape the one-story burning building through a back door in the kitchen. No one was injured in the blaze since most of the fire was concentrated toward the front of the house, according to firefighters on the scene.

LaPlace firefighters work to extinguish the last burning embers of an early morning house fire at a residence on W. 5th Street. (Staff photo by Robin Shannon)

“I was up getting ready for work when my nephew came running from the bedroom screaming the house was on fire,” said Jerry Randal, one of the residents of the home. “We both grabbed an ice chest full of water to try and douse the fire, but it had already gotten too out of control.”

St. John District Fire Chief Doug Brasington said the fire started sometime around 7:17 a.m. and firefighters were on the scene by 7:20 a.m. He said the cause of the blaze has not been determined. He said the electricity in the home was turned off at the time of the fire and the residents were using candles to light the home.

“I had just woken up when I turned over to see fire everywhere,” said Carnell Randal, the occupant of the room where the fire may have started. “All I could do was run out of the house and call 911.”

Curtis Randal, another resident of the home, said he had been renting the house the past 10 years. He said he was awoken by the screams of the other men inside.

“It was bad,” said Curtis Randal. “Real bad.”

Firefighters from LaPlace and Reserve worked to control the blaze, which was finally extinguished about 8:50 a.m. Firefighters had to tear away portions of the building’s roof to get to the last smoldering embers of the fire. The response team blocked both lanes of West 5th Street, between Elm Street and Birch Street, until the fire was extinguished.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

YOU CALL THIS NEWS wrote on Nov 24, 2008 12:23 PM:

" Who was the house being rented from?
Was it insured?; by who?; for who?
Why was the electricity turned off?
Who is claiming a 3 minute response time by the fire dept.??????
Who are these renters?
All landlords should be warned about
these pyromaniac renters.
How did they power their big screen tv
if there wwas no electricity? "

NEWS FLASH wrote on Nov 25, 2008 5:28 AM:

" Tenants burn down landlord's rental property; "????NO CHARGES FILED????"
Shouldn't somebody be charged with arson
in this case? "

ESJ2000 wrote on Nov 25, 2008 1:42 PM:

" I agree with the comments below, but where in the article does it say anything about a big screen tv? That totally negates anything further from that responder in my opinion... "

ACLU wrote on Nov 26, 2008 9:17 AM:

" I BELIEVE:
To: ESJ2000; the purpose of the comment
is to express views on the content of the news; NOT TO ATTACK OTHER RESPONDERS "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545