Nine caught in Internet sting
‘Cyber detectives’ posed as minors

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:54 AM CST


Staff Reporter

LAPLACE “ A three-week investigation conducted by an assortment of parish and state law enforcement agencies netted nine men from across the state and nation on various Internet crimes charges involving juveniles, said St. John Sheriff Wayne Jones.

According to a release from the Sheriff’s Office, Jones said his office hosted a joint online undercover sting operation where over 20 “cyber detectives” posed as minors and waited to be targeted by suspected sexual predators.

“We never make first contact when we conduct these types of operations,” said Det. Toby Aguillard of the Tangipahoa Sheriff’s Office, who was part of the sting. “They come after us and it happens almost instantly.”

Jones announced the following arrests as part of the operation: Chad Wayne Raborn Jr., 21, of Amite; Saravanan Perumal, 39, of California; Jeremy W. Barr, 25, of Many, La.; Royce Eugene Adams, 53, of Shreveport; Ricky L. Hano Jr., 24, of Holden, La.; Kurtis Latiolais, 29, of St. Martinville; David S. Hartman, 36, of Cuba, Ala.; Dalton J. LaCombe, 54, of Iota, La.; and Trenton Cody Breland, 24, of Bogalusa. The nine men face charges ranging from indecent behavior with juveniles, to computer-aided solicitation of a minor for sexual purposes, to felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile.

“These arrests serve as a reminder that the Internet still poses real danger from those who would sexually exploit our children,” said Jones. “Every parent must remain vigilant in supervising and monitoring their children’s online activities.”

According to the release, eight of the nine men engaged in “sexually explicit” conversations with detectives whom they believed were underage girls. The release said some of the men asked for sex, while others described various sexual acts they wished to perform on their victims. Some also sent explicit pictures over the Internet and exposed themselves via webcam.

The highest profile arrest was that of Raborn, an employee of the Tickfaw Police Department who was found to have images of child pornography on his personal electronic equipment. Further investigation revealed evidence that Raborn had engaged in sexual activities with an underage juvenile. Raborn was arrested by Tangipahoa Parish authorities and booked with possession of pornography involving juveniles and felony carnal knowledge of a juvenile.

Aguillard, who is a member of the Louisiana Electronic and Financial Crimes Task Force, explained that area agencies try to get together two or three times a year in an effort to determine the status of investigations like this.

“It helps our detectives see who is working whom,” said Aguillard. “There are occasions where we have predators who target multiple detectives involved in an operation. It is a good opportunity to share information between departments and it also serves as a suitable training exercise for detectives new to Internet investigations.

Jones said the operation included detectives from Sheriff’s Offices in St. John, St. Charles, Tangipahoa, Assumption, Terrebonne and St. Landry Parishes, in addition to investigators from the Kenner Police Department, Tickfaw Police Department and Louisiana State Police. The State Attorney General’s Office and United States Secret Service also contributed to the sting.

“The public can remain confident that the St. John Parish Sheriff’s Office will continue to work with its partners in law enforcement to protect our children by identifying and arresting Internet predators,” Jones said.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

RED WHITE BLUE wrote on Nov 26, 2008 10:46 AM:

" FANTISTIC:
JOB WELL DONE:
Please have them prosecuted somewhere
they will suffer the full extent of punishment allowed for their crime.
Please; not here by the incompetent local judicial system.
Bring them back here to serve their sentence under the supervision of BUBBA
AND THE BOYS in the cell block.
Don't turn them loose like C. Davis. "

fed up wrote on Nov 26, 2008 2:54 PM:

" I think that this kind of operation is wonderful and hope it would be done more. The guilty parties listed here are "SICK, SICK, SICK!!!!" That is a disgrace and disgusting. "

ALSO FED UP wrote on Nov 29, 2008 9:19 PM:

" FED UP: Can we get together a group of like-minded citizens to picket the culprits responsible for putting Davis
back on the street?
We also need to picket RCC for their cover-up and failure to protect the children; what a bunch of scripture quoting hypocrites. "

angel wrote on Dec 1, 2008 11:33 AM:

" well i agree that the gulity should spend there time but i also know one of the 9 arrested and what happened is the young girl that he had been dating told him she was 17 and in the state of la 17 is legal. so the guy was lied to and used and never knew her true age. even the little girls friends believed her to be 17. so you guys are saying that he should be put to jail all because his girlfriend lied to him the whole time they were dating? sayng she was 17 and legal? god doesnt punish the inocent "

WHO SAID SO wrote on Dec 2, 2008 11:36 AM:

" Ms. Angel; how old was this fellow dating the 17 year old? Was he sight impaired? Was this girl one of the cyber-detectives?
How is this dating an under-aged girl
related to internet predators?
You have me confused. Please explain.
Did this 17 year old's parents know and allow her date older men? Surely; they knew her age; maybe they are the ones who need to be prosecuted. "

angel wrote on Dec 3, 2008 12:57 PM:

" well the girl looked and acted like she was 17,even people around her believed she was 17. and the fellow in question was 21. she dated her for 4 months and was lead to believe she was 17. her parent condoned the relationship and never approahed him and staeed that she was 15. so do you think the 21 year old fellow should be punished becuase of a 15 year old girls lie because she wanted to date this fellow. and the reason it is being made suck a big deal of was because the 21 year old boy had a naked picture on him phone. but the phone time he was lead to believe she was legal. i hope this clears some things up

god bless and ask more questions if u wish "

NOT THERE YET wrote on Dec 3, 2008 4:33 PM:

" Angel;
What does the incident you are writing about have to do with the internet sting by the cyber-detectives?
Was the incident with the 15 year old
separate and apart from the 21 year old
using the internet to try to establish additional contacts with under-aged subjects?
Apart from that; were the parents charged with contributing to delinquency?
Were they charged with child abuse?
Were they pimping for their daughter?
It looks like the 21 year old should go to jail for stupidity if nothing else. "

YGTBK wrote on Dec 3, 2008 4:49 PM:

" How dumb does a 21 year old have to be
to date a 15 year old for 4 months without suspecting she is under age?
Who is so naive as to refer to someone as "A 21 YEAR OLD BOY"?
He is 21 and responsible for his actions
It looks like a trap was set and the 21
year old got part of his anatomy caught in it. He doesn't deserve sympathy; he deserves to spend some quality time with BUBBA in the hornymoon suite cell. "

WHAT wrote on Dec 3, 2008 5:15 PM:

" angel:
Is this a racial thing; that you are so strongly defending the stupid 21 year old trying to score some young girls?
NOT IMPLYING? JUST ASKING? "

THANK YOU wrote on Dec 23, 2008 1:07 PM:

" Nice job with the internet sting.
While you were chat-rooming with dirty old men, don't forget the robbers and murderers you are letting run rampant.
If you want applause; put them "ALL"
away and post "ALL" their pictures. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545