Legal action may end Edgard ferry struggle

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, November 4, 2008 2:08 PM CST


Staff Reporter

LAPLACE – St. John attorneys are hoping that legal action might put an end to the fight to get the parish’s Reserve-to-Edgard ferry floating across the Mississippi River again.

Kerry Brown, a LaPlace attorney and member of the St. John Council legal team, said he is filing a declaratory judgment that will examine a 40-year-old agreement between the parish and St. John the Baptist Church in Edgard. He said the church is blocking efforts by Entergy to reposition a utility pole needed to power the ferry’s ramp and other traffic-control devices around the West Bank landing.

“The judgment will look into what took place when the church donated use of a servitude for the levee and the ferry back in 1967,” said Brown. “It will determine if terms of that agreement have been violated.”

The 17-car ferry, an important mode of transportation for parish residents on both sides of the river, has been shut down since June of 2007 for repairs and improvements as part of a project spearheaded by the Army Corps of Engineers. During those improvements, the Corps advised that Entergy must move a utility pole in the levee’s slope, since the previous placement could potentially damage the levee in that area.

To resolve the placement issue, Entergy had planned to install a pole on River Road that will extend lines to another pole on the river batture near the landing. The changes have stirred up a property access dispute between Entergy and the church.

“The church decided not to approve use of the servitude to move the pole,” said St. John Public Information Officer Buddy Boe. “We are trying to determine if the church still has grounds to refuse since we have an agreement that goes back 40 years.”

Representatives for the Archdiocese of New Orleans declined to comment citing it as a pending legal matter.

Boe said at the time of the Corps of Engineer’s project, which wrapped up in January of this year, the state initiated a project that paid for repairs to landings on the East Bank and West Bank. Boe said those improvements have since been completed.

“Everything is done on our end,” said Boe. “The ferry is ready to run today. We just want the people to understand that everyone wants the ferry turned back on.”

Figures from the state show that about 11,000 vehicles and 1,800 pedestrian riders use the ferry monthly. With the boat out of commission, motorists have had to drive an extra 9 to 12 miles out to the Veterans Memorial Bridge in St. James Parish, which connects to the town of Wallace. The trek adds over 20 minutes to a ride that would be 15 minutes on the ferry.

“It has become a hassle for anyone who works at the courthouse, as well as for residents of the West Bank who need to travel to the East Bank to shop and conduct business,” Boe said. “The parish is interjecting itself into this issue with the hope of resolving it quicker.”

Boe said the St. John Council voted in favor of taking legal action at an October 14 council meeting.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

chenier wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:34 PM:

" We spent a lot of money to build two bridges to get us from one side to the
other.So why do we need to support the cost of running a ferry.That money could
be used for something else "

get real wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:24 AM:

" Chenier: dead on C
It sure sounds like the many paying for the extravagances of the few.
All this to cut a 20 minute commute to 15 minutes.
There can't be any cost savings when you figure in the cost of the boat, the salaries of the workers, the fuel for the boat, and the licenses involved.
Also take into consideration the fog and river traffic, and the road trip is a lot safer; any body remember the Luling ferry disaster? "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545