LAPLACE – The race for St. John district attorney was a first-class, clean campaign on the part of both parties, and new District Attorney Tom Daley wanted to thank his opponent for that.
“The only way you have a campaign as clean as we had it, is for both candidates to decide to do that,” he said. “When one starts throwing mud, then the other one usually has to respond.”
|
|
“I want to thank Kerry Brown for the election being the way it turned out,” Daley said. “From the time we both began shaking hands, we decided to act like two Christian gentlemen, and that’s what we did. I think it was a positive thing for the parish.”
Daley will take over as district attorney on January 1, 2009, after John Crum resigns the position he has held for 24 years.
Daley entered the race as the heavy favorite since he had 24 years of public service in the judicial system, and it was Brown’s first attempt at public office. But he ended up having a stronger fight from Brown than some experts expected.
“I was surprised to see how close it ended up being,” Daley admitted. “But I think that is a credit to the fact that Kerry ran a very smart campaign, and got his message out.
“But in the end I think my experience was the reason I won,” he said. “I’ve had a lot of experiences with people over my 24 years, and apparently I left a good enough impression on them that they voted for me.”
Incredibly, Daley has won election three previous times, but never had to actually run a race.
He won his first seat as a district judge with no opposition, then ran twice for Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals judge, and never had any opponent in those races either.
“That is pretty unusual to never have had any opposition,” Daley said. “And this campaign was really different than any normal campaign since we had it interrupted twice by hurricanes.
“The one thing I did learn is that it sure takes a lot of time and effort,” he added. “I’m tired.”




Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!