Aug. 28 tap water deadline set
Those close to plant could receive filtered water first

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Friday, July 25, 2008 5:17 PM CDT


Staff Reporter

LAPLACE – After over a year’s worth of delays in installation of a tap water filtration system for St. John Parish, representatives from the designers and manufacturers of the system told the parish council Tuesday night that it should be ready by the end of next month.

Facing harsh criticism over the sluggish pace to resolve various issues in getting the parish’s new $3.3 million Nano Filtration System fully operational, representatives from MWH, the designers of the system, and General Electric, the manufacturers of the system, said the project is on track for completion the week of August 28.

“We are looking to have filtered water running through the parish system by that date,” said MWH Principal Engineer Ray Rials. “We wish it had happened faster, but we are motivated to get it onboard.”

Although a relatively concrete date had been given, GE and MWH still did not specifically say when all parish residents could begin to consume the clean tap water they continue to be promised.

Kade Gibson, an engineer for GE Water and Process Technology, said that the old water must be completely flushed from the system before the filtered water is running parish wide. He said the flushing, which should take about a month, would occur after the August 28 completion date.

“Residents will have better quality water by the end of August, but it will take some time to get it through the system completely,” said Gibson. “We want to get this done as soon as we can.”

It also comes down to how close residents live to the facility where the filtration system is housed. Rials said residents living closer to the plant, located just south of Interstate 10 near US Highway 51 in LaPlace, would get fully filtered tap water sooner than others, but residents parishwide would be enjoying it within a month of the completion date.

Rials and Gibson said all of the major setbacks in completion, such as delays in equipment delivery, defects in the computer system and problems with water pressure, have been resolved. Rials said the project has now been narrowed down to a few minor fine-tuning issues that are a result of getting a comprehensive system of this kind ready for regular use.

Despite the vote of confidence from MWH and GE that the project is on track, council members still seemed skeptical, and frustration still clearly looms over the tenuous tap water topic.

“It’s good that you are motivated, but you are not the ones getting phone calls from constituents,” said District 6 Councilman Ronnie Smith to Rials and Gibson. “I think we are all tired of buying bottled water.”

Jaclyn Hotard, St. John council chairwoman, agreed with Smith’s assessment and said she does not feel comfortable with the August 28 date.

“This is a very important issue to the people in St. John,” Hotard said. “It has become tiresome to talk about.”

District I Councilman Haston Lewis questioned the level of maintenance that might be needed once the system is running. Gibson assured Lewis and the council that the parish has invested in a good system.

“We have a good support network with many employees ready to assist when needed,” said Gibson. “But we expect there will be no issues at all.”

Rials added that the system is actually working in automatic right now, but said that the filter membranes have not been installed, so nothing is being filtered out.

Rials said once the membranes are installed, a sample of the filtered water must be forwarded to the Department of Health and Hospitals for final approval before it can flow through the system.

Officials from DHH and the Environmental Protection Agency had imposed mandates on the parish back in 2002 to remove harmful chemicals from the tap water supply. The chemicals had been added to the drinking water to remove unappealing discolorations.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545