Baloney not bitter about Garyville vote
Main voice in Garyville incorporation issue has no plans for appeals at this time

By KEVIN CHIRI
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 3:36 PM CDT


Editor and Publisher

GARYVILLE – Geri Baloney sounded relaxed and content on Monday.

Two days after losing her hard-fought effort as the town of Garyville attempted to become the first municipality in St. John Parish history, Baloney seemed at peace with the way the vote came out on Saturday.


Final, unofficial numbers from the clerk of court’s office showed just over 67 percent of the people voting “No” on Saturday in the question of “Shall the Town of Garyville be incorporated?”

That ended several difficult months of campaigning, and then court challenges, in one of the most controversial issues seen in years for St. John Parish.

The issue became so intense that racial signs even were seen on the streets of Garyville last week, with the election just days away.

But after pondering the results of the election all weekend, Baloney said on Monday that she had no regrets, and was ready to move on.

“Absolutely no regrets about going through this,” she said. “I look back on this as the most meaningful project I’ve ever engaged in. My grandmother always told me to approach any project and take the right road, then let the chips fall where they will. I believe I did that.”

Next up for the Garyville lawyer?

“No court appeals planned at this time. Nothing more with the Garyville incorporation issue,” she said with a slight laugh.

“No, the next thing for me is the March of Dimes fundraising project that I will be the St. John spokesperson for. That should be in October and I hope the newspaper will get behind it.”

As for the incorporation drive, which seemed to take a turn against the committee last week when a judge ruled the local industry would not be a part of the proposed town’s boundaries for the election, Baloney said she didn’t feel bad about what happened, but rather thinks she did all she could do for the attempt to form the municipality.

“How do I feel today?” she responded to the question. “I would feel better if we would have won. But I think we put the info out there, and I know this was the right thing for this community. I saw people at the polls who I normally have not seen there, and this entire project got people involved in the process for change. That is always a good thing.”

In the end, she said it was a direct vote along racial lines that led to defeat. She claims that 98 percent of whites who voted were against the proposition, while 85 percent of the blacks were for it.

“There were more whites who voted and that is the difference,” she said.

“You know, I wasn’t shocked that this would become somewhat of a racial issue, even though it shouldn’t be,” she noted. “But I’ve lived with this kind of thing all my life, and it’s the state of things in America, so it didn’t surprise me in a great way.”

St. John Parish President Bill Hubbard said he is glad the incorporation effort failed, simply because he saw it as a way to divide the parish.

“I don’t think we needed a divisive community and in my opinion, this incorporation effort was doing that,” he said. “I’m happy the people voted, but I’m glad it failed.”

Hubbard said that his promise about “not forgetting Garyville” is as good today as it was before the campaign began.

“The thing that I will commit to the people of Garyville is that you are not forgotten,” he said. “We can’t focus on Garyville any more than we can focus on anyone else. But I can promise that Garyville will be taken care of as much as anyone else for now on.”

To back that up, Hubbard pointed out the fact that Anthony Monica Drive is about to be completely resurfaced; there was an excavator in one subdivision as he spoke doing some drainage work; and the Parish Council has on their next agenda the matter of hiring a firm to develop the historic districts in Garyville, along with several other parish communities.

Baloney said that the matter of trying to get Garyville incorporated got serious in the early part of 2008, even though the idea has floated around for years.

“I told people who had approached me that I would help if they got serious with it,” she said. “And once they did, we were off and running. I expected all along that we would end up with some legal battles from it, and even as things turned out in the end, none of it really shocked me.”

Baloney said that she knew she would end up getting strong opposition from parish leaders, since Garyville was attempting to take tens of millions of dollars from the parish coffers.

“Anytime you try to get as much as $20 million from a government agency, you’re not ever going to have them give it up so easily,” she remarked.

Parish officials sent out several direct-mail flyers late in the week, making their points on the issue, which was to argue with the “no new taxes” line from the Garyville group, as well as back the position of industry money not being a part of the new town.

But in the end, it was the lawsuits from five of the industry giants in the area that seemed to do in the incorporation effort. Marathon Petroleum, Cargill, Nalco, Stockhausen and Gramercy Alumina all filed lawsuits against the effort, as did a community group from

Reserve, since the proposed boundaries included their companies. All those industries had filed paperwork as much as 40 years ago that granted them an exemption from any future municipality.

Once the matter got to court last week, Ad Hoc Judge Anne Simon eventually ruled that for the election, industry did, in fact, have an exemption from the town’s boundaries and would not be included should the Town of Garyville be formed.

“No doubt that really hurt us,” Baloney said. “I think we might have had 20 percent of the whites in our corner before that. But once that got ruled on, we lost them too.”

Baloney made it clear she still disagrees with the way her group was handled in court, and the decision that went against them, but still said she does not plan any court challenge to revive the case at this time.

“I’m just saying that for this time I don’t plan any appeal,” she said.

Even though she spent undoubtedly thousands of dollars of her personal money paying a legal team to help her in the case, she still said she didn’t regret the effort.

“It was the right thing for the town,” she said. “So there is no looking back, and absolutely no regrets on what I tried to do.”

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Mike wrote on Jul 22, 2008 4:26 PM:

" Good Job Geri! I'm upset that we lost, but what a positive way to look at it. Keep your head high! You are NOT a failure, the people who didn't want to incorporate is! "

Thank you Geri wrote on Jul 22, 2008 4:36 PM:

" You have proven that we need smarter leadership in this parish. Hubbord did you lift your finger? "

Garyville Resident wrote on Jul 22, 2008 7:41 PM:

" Stop making this a race issue Gerri. I am white and I did not support it from the beginning. It had nothing to do with race but the real motive behind why the wanted to incorporate.

You state it was for lack of services. I don;t believe that is the real reason. The same group that makes up Save Our Neighborhood was behind the incorporation. I feel it was more because certain individuals want to control all the planning and zoning of the area. This individual wants to develop the land. If he controlled planning and zoning instead of the parish, he would get what he wants.

People voted it down because members of your committee lied to them. Is the letter Fred put out true. Did you lie about Tommy in court and when he found out the truth he quit the committee. "

Big City wrote on Jul 23, 2008 9:56 AM:

" Geri- I think you made your point very clear to St. John Parish authorities and now we just all have to sit back and see if Mr. Hubbard demonstrates that he is willing do more for Garyville. The incorporation may have not passed but I totally agree that the work performed by the committee did shed some light on many things and did get the needed attention from the Parish. I applaud your efforts to lead up this committee and I'm sure you will do a great job at your next adventure as well. "

voter wrote on Jul 23, 2008 8:08 PM:

" why the white/black thing. we voted! everyone had the right to vote. stop it baloney. THE people who cared, voted. "

SaintsFanLife wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:14 AM:

" No she DIDN'T lie about Tommy...HE lied and when he got called out in open court HE quit the committee. After that he went back running to Snowdy...why??? b/c Tommy was Snowdy's law clerk!!! So Garyville Resident GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT!!!!! And Fred didn't put the letter out there...common sense...IT WAS TOMMY!!!!!!!!!! "

simple minded wrote on Jul 24, 2008 1:48 PM:

" Geri, I'm black and I guess fall in the 15% who voted againt incorporation. I felt from day one that the committee could not adequately address questions and all I heard was what could get in the form of grants. The 85% need to do what I do. Get yourself a real job, take care of your property if you own property and stop looking for free grants and government money. I don't agree that this was a racial issue at all; the only people making or claiming a racial issue appears to the those that were part of the committee. "

sunshynelife wrote on Aug 12, 2008 8:28 AM:

" Well. I don't think Gerri made this to be a race thing. I think all the folks who drove their cars out in the middle of the night to paint and write the racial remarks on the campaiogn signs made this into a racial thing. It's sad that my six year old daughter had to see such profane vandalism that occurred. I am sad that I had to explaion to her that some people just are petty and set in their ways. And yes, I am a lifelong Garyville resident and white! "

Kody J. Melancon wrote on Sep 4, 2008 7:39 PM:

" As I reviewed the archives, I just ran across this article. I think Geri Baloney is to be commended for courageous work. It certainly takes courage to take a stance on such issues as this one. Its seems like the bottom line here is that a community of African Americans were attempting to better their neighborhoods by having more a direct governing body that would truly uplift them. The racism lies within the institution, which yields racism at the individual level. The key indicator of that race and power was an issue is in the numbers (98% white voted and 85% black). These numbers suggests that there is some strong racial tension and numbers do not lie. The bottom line is that whites in the parish want to maintain the power that yields racism. "

my home town wrote on Sep 17, 2008 2:39 PM:

" Were did you get your numbers of 98% white and 85 % black? I found numbers from ZIPsknny that shows 47.4 % white and 50.9 black in Garyvlle zip code 70051. Are you sure it's racism? or some people did care about what happens.I said this many times you can make your communty better,by getting off your butt. Are you sure it racism Koby? "

Kody J. Melancon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:14 PM:

" Well let's see. Maybe I can educate you on a little something here. I do realize that not everyone understand how to read numbers. "47.4 % white and 50.9 black" are the percentages of RESIDENTS living within the Garyville area. 98% of the 47.4% whites living in Garyville went out to vote and 85% of the 50.9% blacks voted. (98% whites and 85% blacks represent the number of residents voting from their respective races) Furthermore, if you have any skills of interpretation or analysis, you would realize that there are no middle grounds between the numbers. 98% versus 85% shows polar opposites. It can be easily generalized that whites didn't want the incorporation while blacsk voted for it. If you need further clarification, please do not hesitate to email me at kjmelanc@hotmail.com Clearly, you do not know how to analyze those numbers. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545