St. John animal shelter slowed by high bids
Design changes may be necessary to keep costs down

By ROBIN SHANNON
Published/Last Modified on Friday, July 11, 2008 5:27 PM CDT


Staff reporter

EDGARD – The St. John Parish Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to reject all bids for construction of the parish’s new animal shelter after the bids came in well over budget.

Public Safety Director Paul Oncale said the low bid of $746,000 greatly exceeds the $450,000 budget the parish originally set for construction of the building. He told the council he received a letter from Murray Architects, the designers of the shelter, requesting that the parish reject the bids and consider redesigning the building.

Oncale said that the architects suggested the parish consider a wood framed structure as opposed to a steel framed building for the shelter. He said it might lower the cost of construction by $100,000 to $150,000.

During Tuesday’s meeting, District 4 Councilwoman Jaclyn Hotard said she had concerns that a redesign to a wood structure may not be as safe as a steel structure and also wanted to know if it would last as long. She asked the administration to compare costs and safety in order to see how a change in design may affect the stability of the building.

“We want something that will last a long time,” said Hotard. “I want to make sure we do the right thing.”

St. John Public Information Officer Buddy Boe said the parish would probably be ready to reopen bids at the next council meeting, scheduled for July 22.

In other action from Tuesday’s meeting, the council voted unanimously in favor of a resolution in support of Nucor Steel Company, who is contemplating construction of a steel mill in St. James Parish. St. John Chief Administrative Officer Pat McTopy said the facility will provide economic opportunity to the entire River Parish region and said St. John Parish should throw its support behind the proposal of the plant.  

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545