Voters narrowly turn down parish millage renewal


Published/Last Modified on Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:01 PM CDT


LAPLACE – Voters in St. John Parish on Saturday narrowly defeated a bond package that would have been used for a wide range of capital improvements.

Unofficial totals from the St. John clerk of court showed 1,793 voters saying “No” on the bond package, with 1,719 saying “Yes.”

That had 51.05 percent voting against the measure, and 48.95 voting against it.


The defeat leaves St. John Parish President Bill Hubbard faced with trying to bring about improvements in the parish on existing revenue, since the bond package would have renewed existing millage and brought in $25 million for the parish to utilize.

The bond package did not require any new taxes.

Meanwhile, a ballot items to renew millage for moquito control did pass.

In that vote, 1,993 voters, or 55 percent, said yes, while 1,590 voters said no.

According to St. John Parish Public Information Officer Buddy Boe, the .48 mills brought in $126,000 in 2007 to supplement the parish’s contract with St. John Mosquito Control.

Each utility customer in the parish also is assessed $2.50 monthly for mosquito control.

On the bond measure for capital improvements, the parish planned to allocate $4 million to serve as the local match for phase I of St. John’s lakefront levee protection, and $3 million for construction and improvement on public roads and highways, including improvement and expansion of Woodland Drive to Belle Terre Boulevard.

Another $5.5 million was slated to go toward several miscellaneous drainage projects parish wide.

There was to be $5 million allocated toward the parish waterworks system.

An additional $5 million was to go toward necessary construction and improvement of public buildings, based on the findings of a $62,000 building use study that was conducted in the parish in March.

Boe said the plans included renovation of the Edgard courthouse in an effort to provide better safety to the parish judges.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



    mindovermatter wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:26 AM:

    " Mr. Hubbard should have thought about how people would vote on these bonds before giving himself a huge fat raise as soon as he got into office. People are not as dumb as he may think they are "

    GOIT wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:06 AM:

    " There were a couple of things in this bond issue that were good. If, and only if, Mr. Hubbard would have put the issues seperate, the ones that would have moved the parish forward would have been successfull. Mr. Hubbard, although professing to be a super business man even after failing in the housing developement in Wallace, is proving that he is no where close to being what he says. Actually he very seldom says anything since he has hired a mouth-piece to do that. That is just one more thing that shows he is not what he professes to be. A new house for so many part time workers is not needed. Actually, there are to many people in the existing structures. Get rid of the dead-heads in the building, Bill, and then you will have excess space to run the parish. "

Write a Comment

(optional)
   


Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545