Unofficial totals from the St. John clerk of court showed 1,793 voters saying “No” on the bond package, with 1,719 saying “Yes.”
That had 51.05 percent voting against the measure, and 48.95 voting against it.
|
|
The bond package did not require any new taxes.
Meanwhile, a ballot items to renew millage for moquito control did pass.
In that vote, 1,993 voters, or 55 percent, said yes, while 1,590 voters said no.
According to St. John Parish Public Information Officer Buddy Boe, the .48 mills brought in $126,000 in 2007 to supplement the parish’s contract with St. John Mosquito Control.
Each utility customer in the parish also is assessed $2.50 monthly for mosquito control.
On the bond measure for capital improvements, the parish planned to allocate $4 million to serve as the local match for phase I of St. John’s lakefront levee protection, and $3 million for construction and improvement on public roads and highways, including improvement and expansion of Woodland Drive to Belle Terre Boulevard.
Another $5.5 million was slated to go toward several miscellaneous drainage projects parish wide.
There was to be $5 million allocated toward the parish waterworks system.
An additional $5 million was to go toward necessary construction and improvement of public buildings, based on the findings of a $62,000 building use study that was conducted in the parish in March.
Boe said the plans included renovation of the Edgard courthouse in an effort to provide better safety to the parish judges.





Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!