LAPLACE – At 4:58 p.m. on Friday afternoon, Judge J. Sterling Snowdy was just two minutes away from cruising uncontested to a third six-year term on the bench of the 40th Judicial District Court.
But at 4:59 p.m., Fontella F. Baker, a LaPlace attorney, walked into the St. John Clerk of Court Office at the Arcuri Center and a few minutes later qualified to challenge Snowdy for his seat in this fall’s election, according to Janet Kavanaugh of the Clerk of Court office.
|
|
Baker represents Snowdy’s first opposition since he won the seat in November 1996. That year, Snowdy and Brenda Birner competed for the Division C seat previously held by a man named Tom Daley, who had taken a seat on the state Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal that spring.
Now Daley is back in St. John campaigning for district attorney. Current District Attorney John Crum Jr., who has held the office since 1985, announced this spring that he would not seek re-election.
Daley, who had to step down from the appeals court to run, and Kerry D. Brown, a LaPlace attorney and parish prosecutor, both qualified to run for district attorney last week.
The ballot this fall also promises to feature two contests for justice of the peace and two for constable.
In District 1, Virgie Jarrow-Johnson and Haston “Bun” Lewis Jr. have both qualified to run for justice of the peace. Travis “Casual” Cook has qualified to challenge incumbent Diane C. Jacob for her justice of the peace seat in District 3.
In St. Charles Parish, District Attorney Harry Morel Jr. won re-election to his sixth consecutive term, unopposed for the fourth election in a row.
Lauren Lemmon qualified to run against Kirk Granier for his 29th Judicial District Court seat.
Comments
Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.
DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.
Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.
Thank you for your comments!