Group says ‘secret’ is out
Garyville supporters claim industry missed key point in filing for industrial status

By KEVIN CHIRI
Published/Last Modified on Tuesday, July 8, 2008 2:21 PM CDT


Editor and Publisher

GARYVILLE – Supporters for the Town of Garyville to become incorporated announced at a public hearing on Monday night what they believe is the “big secret” about why they feel certain they will be able to reap huge financial benefits from industry in the region.

Attorney Abril B. Sutherland, a staff member with incorporation committee chairperson Geri Baloney, told a crowd of nearly 100 people that their group is certain they have found a fatal error by the industry in the region, which all filed decades ago for industrial area exemption from any future municipality.

Sutherland told the crowd that none of the industry which is currently claiming industrial exemption fulfilled a key element of the Louisiana state statute, which is to properly have a land use study completed.

“I would bet my house that the industry exemption is not valid,” Sutherland told the group. “We feel sure the industry will be included in our town’s boundaries.”

The big announcement comes barely over a week before the scheduled vote to decided whether Garyville will incorporate. The July 19 election will go before a little over 4,000 residents of the area including Garyville, Mt. Airy and a portion of Reserve, unless current court action delays the election.

Garyville Incorporation Committee leaders have insisted that “there is no court action that can stop the election,” however five current lawsuits in court should be considered this week, all of which are asking for possible delay of the election to settle matters involving the industrial exemption question.

The industrial issue is a huge one, since millions of dollars of tax money currently going to St. John Parish government could potentially go to a small, new municipality, if voters approve it.

All along, the industry—Marathon Petroleum, Cargill, Nalco, Stockhausen and Gramercy Alumina—have provided documentation as part of their lawsuits against the incorporation group, showing that they believe to be exempt from the new municipality since they filed proper state paperwork many years ago.

However on Monday night, Baloney and Sutherland both told the crowd that the industry missed a vital part of the state statute, by not providing a land use study as part of the request.

“We could not give away our strategy about this until now, since there is now not enough time for industry to fix the mistake,” Sutherland said. “They would need 10 days to advertise for the exemption in the paper, and then get the approval from the Parish Council, but there isn’t enough time.”

Marathon attorney Daniel Wellons said that he has heard about the land use question, but still does not see it as an issue.

“Marathon has reviewed all of its paperwork and is certain that we are in compliance with the state statute,” he said. “This is just another delay tactic on their part, all to delay the merits of the issue. We want to get to court and have a chance to prove our position as an industrial exempt area.”

Wellons said that the simple fact Marathon has operated for 30 years, fulfilling their end of the industrial area exemption, proves that their status is good.

“For 30 years we have done all the things we were supposed to as an industrial exempt area. We have provided our own water, sewer, police protection and more,” he pointed out. “How, after 30 years, is anyone going to suddenly say that our exemption is not valid?”

Baloney, who has hinted all along during this controversy that she was confident the Town of Garyville would get “all or some” of the industry money, said that residents of the new town could see “Christmas in July” should the vote go through.

“We feel confident that the industrial area was not properly created,” she added to the crowd on hand for a public hearing on the matter. “They didn’t follow all the steps because they apparently didn’t realize some of them, and then they relied on the parish to check things.”

However Baloney said the new town does not plan on adding extra taxes on the industry.

“We don’t plan on taxing them more than they are now,” she said. “There is enough taxes coming from them now. We just want our fair share for our town. Our new town is equally capable of granting industrial area status, and we can do that for Marathon and the others.”

The final word on the matter continues to be delayed by court action, further pushed ahead on Monday by Baloney when she asked for a second time for the recusal of 40th Judicial District Judge Sterling Snowdy, who was overseeing the five lawsuits in the case.

However this time, unlike last week when he denied the recusal request, Snowdy granted the recusal. That ended any decisions on Monday about the lawsuits, and the industrial status, until the Louisiana Supreme Court appoints a new judge for the case. Even then, the new judge must have time to review all the suits before he can call a new court date.

“All of this is just trying to delay any final word on the industries since the election is getting closer,” Wellons added. “With all these motions and writs she is filing, it just gets us closer to the election before a final decision can come from the courts regarding the industry status. And then Ms. Baloney will probably try to argue that it’s too late for them to stop the election.”

“We have asked for one thing and one thing only from the beginning. Go ahead and vote for the Town of Garyville. We have no objection to that. But just leave our property out,” Wellons said.

Comments


Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone. All readers comments must be approved by our staff before posting to the Web site. Be aware, in accordance with the Communications Decency Act and provisions upheld in judicial appeal, that you are responsible for comments posted on this Web site. The L'Observateur is not liable for messages from third parties.

DO NOT POST:
* Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
* Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
* Personal attacks, insults or threats.
* The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
* Comments unrelated to the story.

Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in The L'Observateur reader comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of L'Observateur. L'Observateur does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized L'Observateur spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!



Write a Comment

Reader Comments

The following are comments from the readers. In no way do they represent the view of .

years in Garyville wrote on Jul 9, 2008 9:58 AM:

" I was at this meeting, and what a waste of my time.The committee tells you just their side of the story.
They call the Assoror a lair and he is not there to defend himself.
Carl Balony got up and said that Nalco was pleading & crying at the planning and zoning meeting about the 80 acre tract of land they want to add to their exsisting industrial site in garyville, but never once said that he was asked to leave this meeting by 2 deputies.It is a good thing that we can read about the other side of a story and make up our mind. Wish all people would read about both sides of a story so they can make up their own minds and not be fed all this hogwash that the incorporation committee feeds them.They talk about the drug problem and the only way it will be stopped is to incoroptate,that is hogwash,they talk about ditches being covered, I paid to have my ditch covered so can other people.I pay no tax on my home and I hope to continue that.My street is very clean, but we as people are not dumping trash all over it. So I love my Garyvill as it is.If I can take care of my property and keep it clean and neat then so can all the rest without being incorporated. "

Garyville resident wrote on Jul 10, 2008 8:41 AM:

" First she claimed that industry would be included and she could not locate where industry had filed for industrial status. Then the parish and industry showed wher ethey filed for industry status. Then she states we never counted on the industry money anyway. Now she is still fighting to get industry money and thinks she found a loophole. Many of the industry applied for industrial status prior to 1984. My question would be did they file the proper procedure that was in effect at the time they filed for status. If they did then they should not be included. If they did not then they may have to pay the tax to the town if it passes. I would like this matter settled before I vote for or against although I am leaning against since there are no definete answers from the committee on what direction the town will take. "

simplistic rebel wrote on Jul 14, 2008 3:27 PM:

" Interesting story written by years in Garyville. It is all a huge joke. Anyone that knows even a little something about the committee members would know that they have a very messed up track record. Come on, how can one criticize St. John Police department or any other office when they have a record for themselves? I think St. John Parish responded very appropriately in the past right Scott and Christy? "

My home town wrote on Jul 14, 2008 4:56 PM:

" Thank you years in Garyville

Garyville is a nice area,Its people like you, look out Grayville trying to keep it looking good. My hat is off to you. "

Submit a Comment

We encourage your feedback and dialog, all comments will be reviewed by our Web staff before appearing on the Web site.
(optional)
   



Contact Us

Click here for e-mail
Phone: (985) 652-9545